- Journal List
- BMC Public Health
- PMC6647087
BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 972.
Published online 2019 Jul 22. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7320-1
PMCID: PMC6647087
PMID: 31331303
1,2Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer
Associated Data
- Data Availability Statement
Abstract
Background
Childhood lifestyle, health-risk behaviours contribute to two-thirds of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) premature mortality in adult populations. The co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs is more harmful to health than that of individual risk factor effects when are added independently. The main objective of the present study was to explore the prevalence, sociodemographic distribution, and the co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs among in-school adolescents.
Methods
The present study is based on the secondary analysis of the first nationwide representative sample of the 2014 Tanzania Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS). A total sample of 3,793 in-school adolescents was included in the present analysis. The dependent variables were as follows: an unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use, excessive alcohol use, and suicide attempt. The analysis involved the Chi squire χ2 test, multinomial and multivariate regression models: to determine the association between the variables of interest. In all analyses, the set level of statistical significance was a p-value of less than 0.05 at 95% confidence intervals.
Results
The most prevalent combination of risk factors for NCDs were as follows: unhealthy diet and physical inactivity 666 (17.6%); unhealthy diet and suicide attempt 151 (4.0); unhealthy diet and tobacco use 98 (2.8); and unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and suicide attempt 81 (2.1). In the adjusted regression model; having three 0.60 [0.40–0.91], and a sum of four and five 0.46 [0.28–0.79] risk factors than having no risk factor showed a significant declined with increasing in adolescents age. Primary in-school adolescents than secondary in-school adolescents were significantly more likely to have two 1.81 [1.42–2.32], three 2.40 [1.63–3.54]; and a sum of four and five 2.90 [1.61–5.13] combinations of risk factors.
Conclusion
The co-occurrence of lifestyle health-risk factors for NCDs was prevalent among in-school adolescents: it was significantly higher among younger adolescents. A multi-strategy public health intervention program may be more effective than that of a single risk factor approach: therefore, suitable for resource-limited settings, such as Tanzania.
Keywords: Co-occurrence, Risk factors, Non-communicable diseases, In-school adolescents, Tanzania, Sub-Saharan Africa
Background
Globally, NCDs are the leading cause of premature mortality and morbidity, however, they are potentially preventable [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) identified four main NCDs as a leading cause of mortality: Cardiovascular disease (CVD), Diabetes mellitus, Chronic respiratory diseases, and Cancers. These four diseases share the four potential modifiable risk factors NCDs: physical inactivity, unhealthy diet, harmful alcohol use, and tobacco use [1]. Studies showed that the modifiable risk factors are usually established during adolescence and are then carried to adulthood [2, 3]. The four modifiable risk factors contribute to over 80% of NCDs premature mortality [1]. Up to 80% of CVD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and over one-third of cancers can be prevented by reducing or eliminating the four modifiable shared risk factors [4].
On the other hand, mental health disorders have an inextricable association with NCDs and their outcomes [5]. There is increasing in knowledge about the complexity and bidirectional causality between mental health disorders and NCDs: therefore, it is proposed as the fifth NCDs [5, 6]. Mental health disorders are the risk factors for CVD, cancers, and premature mortality [6]. Individuals with mental health disorders have a higher chance of premature death than that of the general population because of their physical health problems including suicide [7]. The suicide attempt is by far the most single strongest predictor of suicide in the general population [8]: it is the ultimate act of behavior that results from interactions of several factors including mental health disorders [9]. Globally, suicide is the second most common cause of death among young people [7]. Suicide cause 75% of death among young people in low- and middle-income (LMICs): about 90% of the world children and youths lives in LMICs [10]. One of the recognized strategies to prevent suicide is the assessment and management of individuals who attempted suicide [8].
Studies have shown that about 70% of premature death in adults is because of the lifestyle health-risk behaviors established during the adolescence period [11, 12]. About 36 million people die every year (63% of the global deaths) because of NCDs: fourteen million deaths are premature. LMICs contribute to 86% of the global NCDs premature deaths [1].
In sub-Saharan Africa, NCDs will be the leading cause of mortality by the year 2030 [12]. In Tanzania, all NCDs caused about 31% of premature deaths in the year 2012: the four main NCDs caused 16% of the deaths [13].
There is a limited number of studies about the co-occurrence and trends of risk factors for NCDs among in-school adolescents: most of the studies are from the middle- and high-income countries. For instance, two studies conducted in Brazil found that the co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs was prevalent among in-school adolescents. In one of the study, it was found that adolescents had one (21.2%), two (37.3%), three (28.5%), and all (8.0%) risk factors for NCDs [14]. In the other study in-school adolescents were found to have the co-occurrence of two (22.2%), three (49.3%), four (21.7%), and five (3.1%) risk factors for NCDs. However, these risk factors were significantly more prevalent among older adolescents than younger adolescents [15]. In a Canadian study, the prevalence of risk factors for NCDs was found to co-occur in multiple combinations among in-school adolescents: however, higher among older adolescents than younger adolescents [16].
Schooling situation among adolescents in Tanzania was explored and reported by a study conducted in the year 2015 through 2016. The study revealed that about 3.5 million primary and secondary school-age children were out-of-school by the year 2012. However, by using the population projection from the 2012 Census data, in the year 2015 there were about 2.2 million and 1.7 million out-of-school children at the primary school level (aged 7—13) and at the secondary school level (aged 14—17), respectively. Moreover, the Demographic Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (2015/16 TDHS-MIS) data reported that over 21.6% of primary-school-age children and 7.1% of secondary school-age children have never attended school [17].
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is projected to have a large proportion and numbers of premature deaths attributed to NCDs by the year 2030 [12]. Currently, the burden of double disease in SSA is an indisputable reality, therefore, it is becoming urgent to address these risk factors for NCDs and more especially among adolescents. The NCDs related premature morbidity and mortality may jeopardize the ongoing achievement in tackling the major infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDs and tuberculosis in SSA. There is insufficient evidence about the prevalence and co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs among adolescents in SSA. Moreover, it is unclear whether the sociodemographic presentation of risk factors for NCDs among adolescents in low-income countries is comparable to those in middle- and high-income countries. Therefore, the present study aimed at exploring the prevalence, sociodemographic distribution, and the co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs among in-school adolescents in Tanzania as an example of a low-income setting of the SSA.
Methods
Data source
The present study is based on a secondary analysis of the first nationwide representative sample of the 2014 Tanzania Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS). The dataset used for analysis in the present study is free available in the following WHO repository website http://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/tanzaniadataset/en/.
Sampling technique and sample size
By adhering to the GSHS methodology, students were selected using a two-stage cluster sampling. The aim was to produce a nationwide representative sample of students from both primary schools (grades/standards 6–7) and secondary schools (form 1–3) aged 13–17 years. At the first stage of sampling, schools were selected with the probability proportional to their reported enrolment size in the national sampling frame. In total, 50 schools out of 20,230 schools were randomly selected to participate in the Tanzania GSHS. In the second stage, systematic random sampling was used to select classrooms from each selected school. All students in the selected classrooms were eligible to participate in the study regardless of their actual age. The school and student response rate was 100 and 87%, respectively. A total of 3,793 students participated and completed the study survey.
Data management
The 2014 Tanzania GSHS, used a standardized questionnaire of the WHO GSHS to develop a country-based questionnaire. The questionnaire was translated into the Swahili language before pre-tested and used for the survey. Students who consented to participate in the survey were given a self-administered questionnaire. In order to protect the students’ privacy, the survey adhered to the principles of anonymous and voluntary participation. The survey used a weighing factor to each student to adjust for non-response and the varying probability of selection. The 2014 GSHS Tanzania was approved by the Tanzania Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (MoHCDGEC); and the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MoEST).
Operational definitions of variables
Tobacco use means the use of any tobacco product in the past 30 days preceding the survey. The question was dichotomized as; the percentage of students who currently used any tobacco product (on at least 1 day during the 30 days before the survey). The variable response was dichotomized as “at least 1” day and “0 days”.
Excessive alcohol consumption was considered if the participant had ever drunk so much to the extent that he/she was really drunk at least once during his/her life. The following question was asked; During your life, how many times did you drink so much alcohol that you were really drunk? The variable response was dichotomized as “ drunk one or more” and “ never drunk ”.
Unhealthy diet was computed as a composite variable from the following four questions: (i) The proportion of students who did not eat fruit (during the 30 days before the survey), (ii) The proportion of students who did not eat vegetables (during the 30 days before the survey), (iii) The proportion of students who drunk carbonated soft drinks (excluding diet soft drinks) during the 30 days before the survey, and (iv) The proportion of students who ate food from a fast-food restaurant (during the 7 days before the survey). The response of each of the variable above was dichotomized as Yes and No. Then, a new composite variable unhealthy diet was computed from the four aforementioned variables. The composite variable response was then dichotomized as Yes (if yes to all the four variables), and No (if not to all or any combinations of no and yes).
Physical activity was assessed according to WHO recommendations at least 60 min of exercise per day in at least 5 days per week for an adolescence population. Any kind of physical activity that could result in increased breathing and heart rate was considered. The following question was used; During the past 7 days, on how many days were you physically active for a total of at least 60 min per day? The variable response was dichotomized as “at least 5 days” and “less than 5 days” a week.
Suicide attempt: The question was dichotomized as: “During the past 12 months, how many times did you actually attempt suicide?” The variable response was dichotomized as “1,2,3,4,5, and ≥6 times attempts” and “ zero attempts”.
The other variables used in the present study were the participant’s demographics; age, gender, and school level (primary and secondary school).
Data process and analysis
The prevalence of risk factors for NCDs among adolescents were examined and evaluated according to demographic characteristics; gender, age, and school level. The proportion of adolescents with one, and a combination of two, three, four and five, risk factors for NCDs were calculated and presented in percentage. The prevalence odds ratio was used to calculate one, and a combination of two, three, four and five, risk factors for NCDs, adjusted to gender, age, and school level.
Since nonresponses were observed to be missing at random (MAR) pattern, multiple imputation was used to examine the possibility of bias, however, no bias was observed. Replacing the missing data with imputed data did not make differences in outcomes of interest, hence a significant measure of association in both the bivariate and multivariate analyses was maintained despite imputation. A maximum of five imputations was run to allow for > 97% efficiency. A multiple imputation is a useful statistic technique replaces each missing value by two or more plausible values of nonresponse in public-use files. It is a useful statistic technique that replaces each missing value by two or more plausible values. The present study used the multiple imputation because of the following reasons; first, the pattern of missing data was missing at random [18–20], second, to account for the consistency of the dedicated sample size values of each variable throughout the analyses. Previous studies elsewhere have used a multiple imputation procedure to account for missing data at random [21–23].
The present study analysis used both descriptive and inferential statistics. Chi-square χ2 test, multinomial and multivariate regression models were used to determine the association between the variables of interest. In all analyses, the set level of statistical significance was a p-value of less than 0.05 at 95% confidence intervals. SPSS version 22 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for the present analysis.
Results
Table1 represents the comparison of risk factors across the demographics of the study participants. Of the 3,793 in-school adolescents analyzed, 51.9% were female, and 78.8% were in the age group 13–17 years. Adolescents who were 12 years old and below had a significantly higher proportion of the unhealthy diet, tobacco use, excessive consumption of alcohol, and suicide attempt compared to other age groups.
Table 1
Risk factors for non-communicable disease according to demographics, N = 3,793
| Variables | Total sample n (%) | Unhealthy diet n (%) | Physical inactivity n (%) | Tobacco use n (%) | Excessive alcohol n (%) | Suicide attempt n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,793 | 3054 (80.5) | 1044 (27.5) | 311 (8.2) | 138 (3.6) | 427 (11.3) | |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 1825 (48.1) | 1445 (79.2) | 443 (24.3) | 159 (8.7) | 75 (4.1) | 194 (10.6) |
| Female | 1968 (51.9) | 1609 (81.8) | 601 (30.5) | 152 (7.7) | 63 (3.2) | 233 (11.8) |
| P value | 0.004 | < 0.001 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.26 | |
| Age (yrs) | ||||||
| ≤ 12 | 674 (17.8) | 578 (85.8) | 207 (30.7) | 96 (14.2) | 42 (6.2) | 109 (16.2) |
| 13–17 | 2988 (78.8) | 2373 (79.4) | 805 (26.9) | 210 (7.0) | 88 (2.9) | 305 (10.2) |
| ≥ 18 | 131 (3.4) | 103 (78.6) | 32 (24.4) | 5 (3.8) | 8 (6.1) | 13 (9.9) |
| P value | 0.001 | 0.09 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| School level | ||||||
| Primary school | 2085 (55.0) | 1772 (85.0) | 585 (28.1) | 215 (10.3) | 89 (4.3) | 268 (12.9) |
| Secondary school | 1708 (45.0) | 1282 (75.1) | 459 (26.9) | 96 (5.6) | 49 (2.9) | 159 (9.3) |
| P value | < 0.001 | 0.58 | < 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.001 | |
Prevalence of risk factors combination among study participants
The most prevalent combination of risk factors were unhealthy diet and physical inactivity 666 (17.6%); unhealthy diet and tobacco use 98 (2.8%); unhealthy diet and suicide attempt 151 (4.0%); and unhealthy diet, physical inactivity and suicide attempt 81 (2.1%).
Association between the number of risk factors and demographics
Table2 represents the multinomial regression of the association between a number of risk factors and adolescent’s demographics. In the adjusted model having three, and a sum of four and five risk factors than having no risk factor significantly declined with adolescent age. Male adolescents were significant less likely than females to have one 0.68 [0.55–0.84], two 0.64 [0.51–0.81], and a sum of four and five 0.61 [0.38–0.98] risk factors compared to having no risk factor.
Table 2
Multinomial regression of the number of risk factors and demographics, N = 3,793
| Variables | Number of risk factors n (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One 2071 (54.6) | Two 968 (25.4) | Three 198 (5.2) | Four + five 89 (2.3) | |
| AOR [95% CI] | ||||
| ∫Age (yrs) | 1.10 [0.84–1.44] | 0.92 [0.69–1.23] | 0.60 [0.40–0.91] * | 0.46 [0.28–0.79] ** |
| Gender | ||||
| Male (Ref. Female) | 0.68 [0.55–0.84] *** | 0.64 [0.51–0.81] *** | 0.81 [0.57–1.13] | 0.61 [0.38–0.98] * |
| School level | ||||
| Primary school (Ref. Sec. school) | 1.71 [1.37–2.14] *** | 1.81 [1.42–2.32] *** | 2.40 [1.63–3.54] *** | 2.90 [1.61–5.13] *** |
Adjusted for all independent variables.
AOR Adjusted odds ratio
Note: ∫Age is continuous, *** = p < 0.001, ** = p < 0.01 * = p < 0.05
Association between the co-occurrence of risk factors and demographics
Table3 represents the multivariate logistic regression of the combination of risk factors and adolescent’s demographics. In the adjusted model the increase of adolescents age was significant association with having the co-occurrence of the following risk factors; unhealthy diet and physical inactivity 1.24 [1.02–1.50]; unhealthy diet and suicide attempt 1.47 [1.13–1.90]; unhealthy diet and tobacco use 1.87 [1.41–2.49]; and unhealthy diet, tobacco use, alcohol use and suicide attempt 2.64 [1.48–4.78].
Table 3
Multivariate logistic regression of a prevalent combination of risk factors and demographics N = 3.793
| Risk factors | Adjusted Odds ratio | Gender (Ref. Female) Male | ∫Age (yrs) | School level (Ref. Sec. school) Primary school |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U + P 666 (17.6) | 1.19 [1.02–0.39]* | 1.24 [1.02–1.50]* | 0.89 [0.75–1.05] | |
| U + S 151 (4.0) | 1.11 [0.89–1.39] | 1.47 [1.13–1.90]** | 0.72 [0.56–0.92]** | |
| AOR (95% CI) | ||||
| U + T 98 (2.8) | 0.84 [0.66–1.08] | 1.87 [1.41–2.49]*** | 0.65 [0.48–0.87]** | |
| U + P + S 81 (2.1) | 1.03 [0.71–1.50] | 1.35 [0.89–2.06] | 0.55 [0.35–0.84]** | |
| U + T + S 43 (1.1) | 1.11 [0.85–1.45] | 1.03 [0.74–1.42] | 0.78 [0.58–1.05] | |
| U + T + A + S 42 (1.1) | 1.25 [0.73–2.13] | 2.64 [1.48–4.78]** | 0.71 [0.37–1.36] |
Adjusted for all independent variables.
Note: U + P=Unhealthy diet + Physical inactivity, U + S = Unhealthy diet + Suicide attempt, U + T = Unhealthy diet + Tobacco use, U + P + S = Unhealthy diet + Physical inactivity + Suicide attempt, U + T + S = Unhealthy diet + Tobacco use + Suicide attempt, U + T + A + S = Unhealthy diet +Tobacco use + Excessive alcohol use + Suicide attempt
∫Age is continuous, *** = p < 0.001, ** = p < 0.01 * = p < 0.05
Discussion
The present study finding showed that unhealthy diet constituted the highest proportion of all risk factors for NCDs followed by physical inactivity. Younger adolescents (≤12 yrs) than older adolescents (> 12 yrs) had a significantly higher proportion of the unhealthy diet, tobacco use, excessive alcohol consumption, and suicide attempt. Another finding was that the primary in-school adolescents than the secondary school adolescents had a significantly higher proportion of the unhealthy diet, tobacco use, and suicide attempt.
The present study finding is in contrast to the previous study conducted in Brazil. In Brazilian studies, the most prevalent risk factors were physical inactivity followed by the unhealthy diet: the proportion of excessive alcohol consumption was significantly higher in older adolescents than that in younger adolescents [14]. The common findings in both the Tanzania and Brazil studies were the high prevalence of the unhealthy diet and physical inactivity: this implies that the socio-cultural norms of the society may be unaware of the burden of these risk factors for NCDs. In SSA, the knowledge of risk factors for NCDs in particular unhealthy diet and physical inactivity among adolescents and youths has been reported to be poor [24]. On the other hand, risk factors such as tobacco use and excessive alcohol consumption may be considered by the society and policymakers to be less harmful to health: the tolerance of these risk factors in the society is uncertain. Therefore, the prevalence of tobacco use and excessive alcohol consumption may be under-reported than that of physical inactivity and unhealthy diet. Suicide attempt was the third most prevalent risk factor in the present study, however, this may be under-reported. This is because suicide behavior including suicide attempt is a sensitive issue in the society that is less disclosed or discussed in public: it is an illegal event in some countries across the world [8]. In the present study, the prevalence of risk factors for NCDs was higher in younger adolescents than that in older adolescents. There is a possibility of early experimentation of these lifestyle health-risk behaviors among adolescents in the Tanzania context.
The present study explored the co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs among in-school adolescents in Tanzania as an example of the low-income country of sub-Saharan Africa. The most prevalent combination of risk factors for NCDs were two factors and three factors: the most prevalent co-occurrence factors were an unhealthy diet and physical inactivity; unhealthy diet and suicide attempt; and unhealthy diet and tobacco use. This finding is comparable to the previous studies conducted in middle-income countries [14, 15]: however, the proportion of these risk factors combination was relatively higher in middle-income countries than that in the present study. Moreover, in contrast to the present study, the previous studies focused on the independent prevalence of the risk factors for NCDs among adolescents [22, 25–29]. There is evidence that the co-occurrence of lifestyle, health-risk behaviours is more detrimental to health than that could be expected if the individual risk factors are added independently [30–37]. It has been suggested that multiple risk factors prevention approaches have a great impact at a lower cost than that of the individual risk factors prevention approach [38, 39]. Therefore, a multiple risk factors approach may be suitable for low-income and resources limited settings such as Tanzania: to mitigate the burden of NCDs risk factors among adolescence population.
In contrast to previous studies, the present study found that the co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs significantly declined with adolescent age. Also, in the present study, the primary in-school adolescents were significantly more likely to have a combination of risk factors for NCDs than the secondary in-school adolescents. These findings suggest that younger adolescents in Tanzania are more likely to have multiple lifestyles, health-risk behaviours for NCDs than older adolescents. In LMICs, adolescents have a significantly high burden of lifestyle, health-risk behaviours for NCDs [40]: they are more affected by cultural, socio-economic, and environmental factors including early family responsibilities than their peers in high-income countries [41]. Therefore, the present finding suggests that NCDs preventive programs among adolescents in a low-income setting such as Tanzania may be started during early adolescence or to the adolescents in primary schools. The findings in middle- and high-income countries showed that older adolescents were significantly more likely than younger adolescents to have the co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs [15, 16]. There is a disparity in the co-occurrence of lifestyle, health-risk behaviours for NCDs according to adolescents age and across the countries income status: this may save as an important definition criterion when deciding to implement NCDs prevention program.
Importantly, in contrast to previous studies, the present study included the suicide attempt as a risk factor for NCDs in the analysis. The study found that the suicide attempt was the third most prevalent risk factors, and it was also prevalent in combination with other NCDs risk factors. Suicide attempt is the most single strongest predictor of suicide in the general population [8]. Suicide cause 75% of death among young people in low- and middle-income (LMICs): about 90% of the world children and youths lives in LMICs [10]. Mental health disorders are the risk factors for CVD, cancers, and premature mortality [6]. There is an inextricable association between mental health disorders and NCDs [5]. It has been shown that adolescents with suicide behaviors such as suicide attempt are more likely to have other NCDs risk factors such as physical inactivity, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption [42, 43].
The present study has several strengths. First, this may be the first study in a low-income setting of SSA to have explored the co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs among in-school adolescents. Most of the previous studies were from middle-and high-income countries. Therefore, the present study finding in Tanzania may save as an example of a low-income setting of sub-Saharan Africa. Second, in contrast to the previous studies in middle- and high-income countries, the present study showed that the co-occurrence of risk factors was significantly prevalent among younger adolescents. Third, the present study analysed the suicide attempt variable: previous studies did not consider to analyse the variable. Suicide attempt was prevalent both as an independent and in co-occurrence with other risk factors for NCDs. Fourth, the present study used multiple imputation to examine the effect of missing data, which is common in survey studies.
The standard GSHS questionnaire is a fast, cost-efficient, easy-to-use tool for assessing the adolescent’s health behaviours in risky and resources-constrained populations. However, it has several limitations and especially when used in the Tanzania context. First, the GSHS involved adolescents who were attending school and therefore the finding may not be generalizable to the out-of-school adolescents. In the year 2014, the gross enrollment of pupils in Tanzanian primary and secondary school was 82.62 and 31.67%, respectively [44]. There were about 2.2 million out-of-school children at the primary school level (aged 7—13), and 1.7 million out-of-school children at the lower secondary school level (aged 14—17) by 2015 [17]. Second, since the data was self-reported, it relied upon study participants recall memory, therefore, there could be potential recall bias. Third, the present study could not measure the chronicity of the risk factors for NCDs because of its cross-sectional design nature. This limits its utility to explain the temporal association of risk factors and adolescent’s demographics. Although the results give a significant insight about the co-occurrence of the risk factor for NCDs among adolescents, we should interpret the results with caution when comparing with findings from other types of study design. Furthermore, the present study did not measure a chemical biomarker to ascertain the use of tobacco or alcohol.
Conclusions
The present study showed clear evidence that the co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs exists and prevalent among adolescents in Tanzania. However, in the present study, younger adolescents were significantly more likely to have a higher prevalence and co-occurrence of risk factors for NCDs. A multi-strategy public health intervention study may be of cost-effective than a single risk factor approach hence suitable for resource-limited settings, such as Tanzania.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the World Health Organization (Geneva) and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) for making data available in a public domain for further analysis. I also thank the Tanzania ministries of Health and Education, study participants, and study team for making the first national wide representative Tanzania Global School-based Students Health Survey 2014 possible. The World Health Organization and the government of the study country had no influence on the present analysis and decision to publish the present analysis findings.
Abbreviations
| AIDS | Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome |
| AOR | Adjusted odds ratio |
| CVD | Cardiovascular Disease |
| GSHS | Global School-based Student Health Survey |
| HIV | Human Immunodeficiency Virus |
| LMICs | Low and Middle-income countries |
| MoEVT | Ministry of Education and Vocational Training |
| MoHSW | Ministry of Health and Social Welfare |
| NCDs | Non-communicable Diseases |
| NSHP | National School Health Programme |
| OR | Odds ratio |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
Authors’ contributions
F.K.S formulated the hypothesis development, searched literature and reviewed the relevant articles, analysed the data and interpreted the findings, and wrote the manuscript. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
No fund was provided for the present study analysis.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets file used for analysis in the present study is publicly available for free in the WHO repository (http://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/tanzaniadataset/en/).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was the secondary analysis of existing public domain (2014 Tanzania GSHS) survey dataset that is available online with all identifier information detached. The Tanzania 2014 GSHS was approved by both the Tanzania Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW) (currently Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children /MoHCDGEC) and Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (MoEVT) (currently Ministry of Education, Science and Technology /MoEST). Therefore, the ethical approval for the present study analysis was automatically deemed unnecessary. The written assent attached to a questionnaire was obtained from eligible participants before filling the questionnaire. Survey procedures were designed to protect student privacy by allowing for anonymous and voluntary participation. Students were clearly explained that they were free not to participate and also not to respond to any question on the questionnaire.
Consent for publication
Not applicable to the present study analysis.
Competing interests
The author declares that he/she has no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
1. World Health Organization . Global action plan for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases 2013-2020. 2013. [Google Scholar]
2. Selvan MS, Kurpad AV. Primary prevention: why focus on children & young adolescents? Indian J Med Res. 2004;120(6):511–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Senbanjo IO, Oshikoya KA. Obesity and blood pressure levels of adolescents in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2012;23(5):260–264. doi:10.5830/CVJA-2011-037. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. World Health Organization . Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases The six objectives of the 2008-2013. 2008. p. 48. [Google Scholar]
5. Ivbijaro G. Mental health as an NCD (non-communicable disease): the need to act. Ment Health Fam Med. 2011;8(3):131–132. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Pryor L, Da Silva MA, Melchior M. Mental health and global strategies to reduce NCDs and premature mortality. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(8):e350–e351. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30140-8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. World Health Organization . Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020. 2013. pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
8. World Health Organization Preventing suicide. CMAJ. 2014;143(7):609–610. [Google Scholar]
9. Turecki G, Brent DA. Suicide and suicidal behaviour. Lancet. 2016;387(10024):1227–1239. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00234-2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Messias E, Kindrick K, Castro J. School bullying, cyberbullying, or both: correlates of teen suicidality in the 2011 CDC youth risk behavior survey. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(5):1063–1068. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.02.005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. World Health Organization . The Second Decade: Improving Adolescent Health and Development. 2001. p. 2. [Google Scholar]
12. Naik R, Kaneda T. Non-communicable diseases in Africa: youth are the key to curbing the epidemic and achieveing sustainable development. Population Reference Bureau. 2015; http://www.prb.org/pdf15/ncds-africa-policybrief.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2019.
13. World Health Organization Non-communicable diseases country profiles. Genève WHO Press. 2014;2014:1–210. [Google Scholar]
14. Silva KS, Barbosa Filho VC, Del Duca GF, de Anselmo Peres MA, Mota J, Lopes A d S, et al. Gender differences in the clustering patterns of risk behaviours associated with non-communicable diseases in Brazilian adolescents. Prev Med (Baltim) 2014;65:77–81. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.024. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Nunes HEG, Gonçalves ECDA, Vieira JAJ, Silva DAS. Clustering of risk factors for non-communicable diseases among adolescents from southern Brazil. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):1–13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159037. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Alamian A, Paradis G. Clustering of chronic disease behavioral risk factors in Canadian children and adolescents. Prev Med (Baltim). 2009;48(5):493–499. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.02.015. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization . Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children: Tanzania verification of the out-of-school children study. 2018. p. 16. [Google Scholar]
18. Rubin DB. An Overview of Multiple Imputation. In Proceedings of the Survey Research Section, American Statistical Association. 1988. pp. 79–84. [Google Scholar]
19. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for non-response in surveys (Wiley series in probability and statistics) 1987. [Google Scholar]
20. Howell D. Treatment of missing data. 2014. [Google Scholar]
21. Azeredo Catarina Machado, Levy Renata Bertazzi, Peres Maria Fernanda Tourinho, Menezes Paulo Rossi, Araya Ricardo. Patterns of health-related behaviours among adolescents: a cross-sectional study based on the National Survey of School Health Brazil 2012. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e011571. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011571. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Randall JR, Doku D, Wilson ML, Peltzer K. Suicidal behaviour and related risk factors among school-aged youth in the republic of Benin. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088233. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Romo ML, Kelvin EA. Impact of bullying victimization on suicide and negative health behaviors among adolescents in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Publica/ Pan Am Health. 2016;40(5):347–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Ssewanyana D, Abubakar A, van Baar A, Mwangala PN, Newton CR. Perspectives on underlying factors for unhealthy diet and sedentary lifestyle of adolescents at a Kenyan Coastal Setting. Front Pub Health. 2018;6:11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Jamison B, Muula AS, Siziya S, Graham S, Rudatsikira E. Cigarette smoking among school-going adolescents in Lithuania: results from the 2005 global youth tobacco survey. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3(1):130. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-3-130. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Kapito-Tembo A, Muula AS, Rudatsikira E, Siziya S. Smoking among in-school adolescents in Dar Es Salam, Tanzania: results from the global youth tobacco survey. 2011. 10.4314/thrb.v13i3.64138.
27. Lim KH, Lim HL, Teh CH, Kee CC, Khoo YY, Ganapathy SS, et al. Smoking among school-going adolescents in selected secondary schools in peninsular Malaysia- findings from the Malaysian adolescent health risk behaviour (MyaHRB) study. Tob Induc Dis. 2017;15(1):9. doi:10.1186/s12971-016-0108-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Suicidal ideation and associated factors among school-going adolescents in Thailand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(2):462–473. doi:10.3390/ijerph9020462. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Health risk behaviour among in-school adolescents in the Philippines: trends between 2003, 2007 and 2011, a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;13(1):1–12. doi:10.3390/ijerph13010073. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Poortinga W. The prevalence and clustering of four major lifestyle risk factors in an English adult population. Prev Med (Baltim). 2007;44(2):124–128. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.10.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. McGinnis JM. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 1993;270(18):2207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Atkins D, Clancy C. Multiple risk factors interventions: are we up to the challenge? Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:102–103. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.016. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Slattery M, Potter JD. Physical activity and colon cancer: confounding or interaction? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(6):913–919. doi:10.1097/00005768-200206000-00002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Noble N, Paul C, Turon H, Oldmeadow C. Which modifiable health risk behaviours are related? A systematic review of the clustering of smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity ('SNAP’) health risk factors. Prev Med (Baltim). 2015;81:16–41. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Morris LJ, D’Este C, Sargent-Cox K, Anstey KJ. Concurrent lifestyle risk factors: clusters and determinants in an Australian sample. Prev Med (Baltim). 2016;84:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.12.009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Mawditt C, Sacker A, Britton A, Kelly Y, Cable N. The clustering of health-related behaviours in a British population sample: testing for cohort differences. Prev Med (Baltim). 2016;88:95–107. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.03.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Ferreira da Costa F, Benedet J, Leal DB, Altenburg de Assis MA. Clustering of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in adults from Florianopolis, SC. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2013;16(2):398–408. doi:10.1590/S1415-790X2013000200015. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Uthman OA, Hartley L, Rees K, Taylor F, Ebrahim S, Clarke A. Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD011163. 10.1002/14651858.CD011163.pub2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. World Health Organization . Prevention of cardiovascular disease : guidelines for assessment and management of total cardiovascular risk. 2007. [Google Scholar]
40. Caleyachetty R, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Tait CA, Schilsky S, Forrester T, Kengne AP. Prevalence of behavioural risk factors for cardiovascular disease in adolescents in low-income and middle-income countries: An individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3:535–544. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00076-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Blum R, Boyden J. Understand the lives of youth in low-income countries. Nature. 2018;554:435–437. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-02107-w. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Cho K-O. Physical activity and suicide attempt of south Korean adolescents - evidence from the eight Korea youth risk behaviors web-based survey. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(4):888–893. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Mangerud WL, Bjerkeset O, Holmen TL, Lydersen S, Indredavik MS. Smoking, alcohol consumption, and drug use among adolescents with psychiatric disorders compared with a population based sample. J Adolesc. 2014;37(7):1189–1199. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.08.007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. The United Republic of Tanzania. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://uis.unesco.org/country/TZ. Accessed 19 Mar 2019.
Articles from BMC Public Health are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
FAQs
What are the 5 risk factors of non communicable disease? ›
NCDs share four major risk factors: tobacco use, physical inactivity, the harmful use of alcohol and unhealthy diets. The epidemic of NCDs poses devastating health consequences for individuals, families and communities, and threatens to overwhelm health systems.
Which among the following factors in acquiring non communicable disease is common among adolescent? ›Such risk factors, including overweight and obesity, physical inactivity, substance use and poor nutrition, substantially contribute to disease development and poor health in later life [8]. For example, the prevalence of overweight and obesity increases drastically during mid-adolescence and into adulthood [9].
What are the factors leading to the increased burden of non communicable diseases in the region? ›Many of these NCDs share a set of modifiable risk factors, such as tobacco use, obesity, poor diet, physical inactivity, and alcohol abuse [1].
What are the 4 main NCDs that are the focus of who? ›The main types of NCD are cardiovascular diseases (such as heart attacks and stroke), cancers, chronic respiratory diseases (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma) and diabetes.
What are the 7 common non communicable diseases? ›- Cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular diseases account for the most non-communicable disease deaths. ...
- Diabetes. ...
- Preventable cancers. ...
- Chronic respiratory diseases. ...
- Mental health conditions. ...
- Injuries.
Diseases that do not spread from one person to another. Examples include cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Hypertension etc.
What are the most common NCDs in children? ›It's estimated that 334 million people currently suffer from asthma and is the most common chronic disease of childhood as it affects 14% of all children globally. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is another common CRD that affects more than 212 million people and causes 3.2 million deaths globally.
What are the four 4 major non communicable diseases? ›Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), such as heart disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes, are the leading cause of death worldwide and represent an emerging global health threat.
What are 6 risk factors of non communicable diseases? ›Depression, diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, obesity, unhealthy diet, smoking, physical inactivity and excess alcohol consumption have been identified by the WHO Global Health Observatory data as common and preventable risk factors that underlie most NCDs.
What are the 4 important modifiable risk factors in preventing NCDs? ›Overview. Reducing the major modifiable risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), such as tobacco use, harmful use of alcohol, unhealthy diets and physical inactivity, is essential to reducing the burden on health and development that NCDs create for countries throughout the Western Pacific Region.
What are the four strategies to prevent or control NCDs? ›
Reducing the major risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) – tobacco use, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet and the harmful use of alcohol – is the focus of WHO's work to prevent deaths from NCDs.
What are two environmental factors that can cause non communicable disease? ›Environmental factors potentially contributing to NCDs, as named by the WHO, include “ambient (outdoor) and household air pollution,” as well as “second-hand tobacco smoke, exposure to chemicals, radiation and noise, and occupational risks.” Further, WHO emphasized that “early life exposure to environmental risks, such ...
What are 3 crucial factors for the spread of communicable diseases? ›Key risk factors for communicable diseases identified in the academic literature can be broadly grouped into categories such as Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), health and public health system, environment, humanitarian response, infrastructure, insecurity, living conditions, nutrition, mass population ...
What are the three factors that contribute to the spread of infectious disease? ›- Source: Places where infectious agents (germs) live (e.g., sinks, surfaces, human skin)
- Susceptible Person with a way for germs to enter the body.
- Transmission: a way germs are moved to the susceptible person.
The term NCDs refers to a group of conditions that are not mainly caused by an acute infection, result in long-term health consequences and often create a need for long-term treatment and care. These conditions include cancers, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic lung illnesses.
What are the five 5 most common communicable diseases? ›Some examples of the reportable communicable diseases include Hepatitis A, B & C, influenza, measles, and salmonella and other food borne illnesses.
What are 5 ways to prevent non communicable diseases? ›Reduce the major modifiable risk factors, such as tobacco use, harmful use of alcohol, unhealthy diets, and physical inactivity. Develop and implement effective legal frameworks. Orient health systems through people-centred health care and universal health coverage. Promote high-quality research and development.
What are the 3 most common communicable diseases? ›- Chlamydia. 1/15. This sexually transmitted disease affects men and women. ...
- Influenza A and B. 2/15. Sudden fever and chills, muscle aches, headache, tiredness, sore throat, congestion. ...
- Staph. 3/15. ...
- E. Coli. ...
- Herpes Simplex 1. 5/15. ...
- Herpes Simplex 2. 6/15. ...
- Shigellosis. 7/15. ...
- Syphilis. 8/15.
- Bacteria. These one-cell organisms are responsible for illnesses such as strep throat, urinary tract infections and tuberculosis.
- Viruses. Even smaller than bacteria, viruses cause a multitude of diseases ranging from the common cold to AIDS.
- Fungi. ...
- Parasites.
Tanzania remains among the countries with the highest burden of infectious diseases (notably HIV, Malaria and Tuberculosis) during pregnancy.
What is the main cause for the spread of diseases in schools? ›
Schools inherently foster the transmission of infections from person to person because they are a group setting in which people are in close contact and share supplies and equipment.
What are the four 4 major non-communicable diseases? ›Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), such as heart disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes, are the leading cause of death worldwide and represent an emerging global health threat.
What are 3 major ways a person can prevent non-communicable diseases? ›Many NCDs can be prevented by reducing common risk factors such as tobacco use, harmful alcohol use, physical inactivity and eating unhealthy diets.
How can we prevent and manage non-communicable diseases? ›Reducing the major risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) – tobacco use, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet and the harmful use of alcohol – is the focus of WHO's work to prevent deaths from NCDs.
What are examples of communicable and non communicable diseases? ›For example, many students are familiar with the flu and strep throat as examples of communicable diseases, and diabetes or heart disease as noncommunicable diseases.
What are the 10 communicable diseases for kids? ›- Chicken Pox (Varicella) Exclude if child has a fever. ...
- Common Colds. Exclude if child has a fever. ...
- Conjunctivitis (Pink-eye) ...
- Diarrhea. ...
- Fifth's Disease (Parvovirus B19) ...
- Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease. ...
- Hepatitis A. ...
- Hepatitis B.
Many different agents that enter our bodies from the outside are the source of communicable diseases. Among these, viruses, bacteria, fungus, and protozoa are the four main categories of pathogens that cause disease.
What is the most common cause of communicable diseases? ›The most common causes are viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites. Infectious diseases usually spread from person to person, through contaminated food or water and through bug bites.